Annonce:

Annonce:

Annonce:

Annonce:

Annonce:

Videnskab.dk
Danmarks førende videnskabsmedie
  • Temaer
  • For skoler
  • Nyhedsbreve
  • Center for Faglig Formidling
  • Om Videnskab.dk
Luk
  • Nyheder
  • COVID-19
  • Red Verden
  • Krop & Sundhed
  • Kultur & Samfund
  • Naturvidenskab
  • Teknologi
Forskerzonen
Støttet af Lundbeckfonden
  • Bliv partner
  • For skoler
  • Nyhedsbreve
  • Center for Faglig Formidling
  • Om Forskerzonen
Luk
  • Forside
  • Kommentar
  • Bøger
  • Podcast
  • Video
  • Nyt om navne
  • Arkiv
Spørg Videnskaben
  • Temaer
  • For skoler
  • Nyhedsbrev
  • Center for Faglig Formidling
  • Om Videnskab.dk
Luk
  • Nyheder
  • COVID-19
  • Red Verden
  • Krop & Sundhed
  • Kultur & Samfund
  • Naturvidenskab
  • Teknologi
Podcast
Danmarks førende videnskabsmedie
  • Temaer
  • For skoler
  • Nyhedsbreve
  • Center for Faglig Formidling
  • Om Videnskab.dk
Luk
  • Nyheder
  • COVID-19
  • Red Verden
  • Krop & Sundhed
  • Kultur & Samfund
  • Naturvidenskab
  • Teknologi
Tjek / YouTube
Luk
Videnskab.dk
Forskerzonen
Spørg Videnskaben
Podcast
Tjek / YouTube
Videnskab.dk
Forskerzonen
Spørg Videnskaben
Podcast
Tjek / YouTube
Videnskab.dk
Forskerzonen
Spørg Videnskaben
Podcast
Tjek / YouTube
Videnskab.dk
Forskerzonen
Spørg Videnskaben
Podcast
Tjek / YouTube
Videnskab.dk
Forskerzonen
Spørg Videnskaben
Podcast
Tjek / YouTube
  • Temaer
  • For skoler
  • Nyhedsbreve
  • Center for Faglig Formidling
  • Om Videnskab.dk
  • Bliv partner
  • For skoler
  • Nyhedsbreve
  • Center for Faglig Formidling
  • Om Forskerzonen
  • Temaer
  • For skoler
  • Nyhedsbrev
  • Center for Faglig Formidling
  • Om Videnskab.dk
  • Temaer
  • For skoler
  • Nyhedsbreve
  • Center for Faglig Formidling
  • Om Videnskab.dk

Annonce:

Videnskab.dk's redaktion
Science Journalism Guide
11 tips for journalists: How to avoid blunders when reporting on science
Have a critical approach to the world’s best subject: Science.
01 januar 2023
How journalists find the right expert
Science Journalism Guide
Tip number 1: Find the right expert 
Avoid uncritically reusing the same, media-accustomed expert sources. Find an expert who has researched your specific angle on a topic.
01 januar 2023
Peer review and scientific journals are the best indicators of credible knowledge
Science Journalism Guide
Tip number 2: Check if the research­ has been published in a scientific journal 
When research is printed in a scientific journal, you as a journalist can better trust that the result is solid.
01 januar 2023
Always ask your sources if the study you are reporting on is consistent with prior research.
Science Journalism Guide
Tip number 3: A single study is not the ultimate truth
The latest research is by no means always the best. Therefore, before you choose a sharp angle based on a new result, you should always check what...
01 januar 2023
Always talk to an independent source
Science Journalism Guide
Tip number 4: Always talk to at least one independent scientist
When reporting that 'new research shows ...', you should always talk to at least one researcher who was not involved in the study.
01 januar 2023
Be aware of conflict of interests
Science Journalism Guide
Tip number 5: Be aware of conflicts of interest 
Scientific research is the most reliable source of knowledge, but research can also be affected by conflicts of interest. Check where the money comes...
01 januar 2023
The journalistic principle of balance is not always equally relevant to science reporting.
Science Journalism Guide
Tip number 6: Avoid false balance 
When scientists disagree, it is the journalist's job to investigate who has the most scientific support.
01 januar 2023
Always ask the scientists or your independent source how likely it is that their study has found a causal connection.
Science Journalism Guide
Tip number 7: Beware of common mistakes when using statistics
A frequent roar among journalists is to get the terms 'correlation and causality' wrong.
01 januar 2023
Many journalists confuse relative numbers with absolute numbers.
Science Journalism Guide
Tip number 8: Don’t exaggerate
Be careful not to exaggerate when reporting on research that finds negligible risks or effects.
01 januar 2023
Ask the scientists what reservations should be included and what they mean for the conclusion.
Science Journalism Guide
Tip number 9: Be honest about uncertainty – also in the headline
Openness about reservations makes your story more accurate and credible - so don't hide reservations at the bottom of your article.
01 januar 2023
If you want to avoid misinformation and misunderstandings, it is a good idea to select case studies for your reporting that are in accord with the research.
Science Journalism Guide
Tip number 10: Choose your cases carefully
A case is a powerful tool and can make a far greater impression than decades of research, which speak against the case.
01 januar 2023
Not all scientific methods are equally strong.
Science Journalism Guide
Tip number 11: Mice or humans? Ask about the research method
Not all research is of equal quality. Here you will get advice on distinguishing good from bad.
01 januar 2023
  •  
  • Side 1
  • ››

Annonce:

Tilmeld dig vores nyhedsbrev

Tilmeld dig vores gratis nyhedsbrev. Det udkommer alle hverdage samt søndage med seneste nyt fra videnskabens verden.
Klik her for at tilmelde dig

Om Videnskab.dk

  • Redaktionelt program
  • Find medarbejder
  • Center for Faglig Formidling
  • Partnere
  • Annoncer
  • Nyhedsbrev
  • RSS
  • Manifest
  • Guide til journalister
  • Evidensbarometer
  • Rettigheder
  • Privatlivspolitik
  • In English
  • Cookie-indstillinger

Kontakt

Ansvarshavende chefredaktør:
Vibeke Hjortlund

Kontakt redaktionen:
redaktion@videnskab.dk

Carl Jacobsens Vej 16,
opg. 16, 2. sal
2500 Valby

: .

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
To Top